Gemini Flash vs GLM-OCR
GLM-OCR is cheaper per page; GLM-OCR is faster; only Gemini Flash supports handwriting; only GLM-OCR supports bounding boxes, confidence.
Gemini Flashgoogle/gemini-flash | GLM-OCRzai/glm-ocr | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Vision model | Open source |
| Price | 3 credits / page | 2 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $3.00 | $2.00 |
| Typical speed | 1.6 s / page | 1.3 s / page |
| Best for | Handwriting and mixed layouts | Low-cost general documents |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | 100+ languages | 100+ languages |
| Max pages per request | 1,000 | 500 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | ✓ Yes | No |
| Math | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bounding boxes | No | ✓ Yes |
| Confidence | No | ✓ Yes |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Gemini Flash
General vision model with strong handwriting and layout understanding at a low price.
Gemini Flash detailsTry both on your own file
Run the file once with each model and compare the output.
結果
変換されたMarkdownやJSONがここに表示されます。
Use one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "google/gemini-flash",
"fallbacks": ["zai/glm-ocr"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}