Mistral OCR vs DeepSeek-OCR
DeepSeek-OCR is cheaper per page; Mistral OCR is faster.
Mistral OCRmistral/mistral-ocr | DeepSeek-OCRdeepseek/deepseek-ocr | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | OCR API | Open source |
| Price | 6 credits / page | 1 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $6.00 | $1.00 |
| Typical speed | 0.9 s / page | 1.1 s / page |
| Best for | High-volume PDF to Markdown | Cheap bulk conversion |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | 100+ languages | 100+ languages |
| Max pages per request | 1,000 | 200 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | No | No |
| Math | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bounding boxes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Mistral OCR
Fast document OCR that returns clean Markdown with tables and embedded images.
Mistral OCR detailsTry both on your own file
Run the file once with each model and compare the output.
結果
辨識出的 Markdown 或 JSON 會顯示在這裡。
Use one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "mistral/mistral-ocr",
"fallbacks": ["deepseek/deepseek-ocr"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}