Google Document AI vs Qianfan OCR
Qianfan OCR is cheaper per page; Google Document AI is faster; only Google Document AI supports forms, bounding boxes, confidence; only Qianfan OCR supports math.
Google Document AIgoogle/document-ai | Qianfan OCRbaidu/qianfan-ocr | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | OCR API | OCR API |
| Price | 3 credits / page | 1 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $3.00 | $1.00 |
| Typical speed | 1.4 s / page | 2.0 s / page |
| Best for | Multilingual scans | Chinese documents |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | 200+ languages | Chinese, English and more |
| Max pages per request | 500 | 200 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Math | No | ✓ Yes |
| Bounding boxes | ✓ Yes | No |
| Confidence | ✓ Yes | No |
| Forms | ✓ Yes | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Google Document AI
Google Cloud OCR with layout parsing and specialised processors.
Google Document AI detailsQianfan OCR
Baidu's OCR-tuned vision model. Strong on Chinese documents and tables.
Qianfan OCR detailsTry both on your own file
Run the file once with each model and compare the output.
Резултат
Ваш Markdown или JSON ће се појавити овде.
Use one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "google/document-ai",
"fallbacks": ["baidu/qianfan-ocr"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}