Jina OCR vs Qianfan OCR
Jina OCR is faster; only Qianfan OCR supports handwriting.
Jina OCRjina/jina-ocr | Qianfan OCRbaidu/qianfan-ocr | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Open source | OCR API |
| Price | 1 credits / page | 1 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $1.00 | $1.00 |
| Typical speed | 1.5 s / page | 2.0 s / page |
| Best for | Clean Markdown at low cost | Chinese documents |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | About 100 languages | Chinese, English and more |
| Max pages per request | 200 | 200 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | No | ✓ Yes |
| Math | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bounding boxes | No | No |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Jina OCR
Compact page-to-Markdown model from Jina AI, built on the DeepSeek-OCR encoder.
Jina OCR detailsQianfan OCR
Baidu's OCR-tuned vision model. Strong on Chinese documents and tables.
Qianfan OCR detailsTry both on your own file
Run the file once with each model and compare the output.
Resultado
Seu Markdown ou JSON aparecerá aqui.
Use one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "jina/jina-ocr",
"fallbacks": ["baidu/qianfan-ocr"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}