Amazon Textract vs PaddleOCR-VL
PaddleOCR-VL is cheaper per page; Amazon Textract is faster; only Amazon Textract supports forms, handwriting; only PaddleOCR-VL supports math, multilingual.
Amazon Textractaws/textract | PaddleOCR-VLpaddle/paddleocr-vl | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | OCR API | Open source |
| Price | 6 credits / page | 2 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $6.00 | $2.00 |
| Typical speed | 1.2 s / page | 1.3 s / page |
| Best for | Forms and key-value extraction | CJK documents |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | 6 languages | 109 languages |
| Max pages per request | 3,000 | 500 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | ✓ Yes | No |
| Math | No | ✓ Yes |
| Bounding boxes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Confidence | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Forms | ✓ Yes | No |
| Multilingual | No | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Amazon Textract
AWS OCR with form key-value pairs, tables and per-word confidence scores.
Amazon Textract detailsPaddleOCR-VL
Open-source document model from Baidu. Excellent on Chinese, Japanese and Korean.
PaddleOCR-VL detailsTry both on your own file
Run the file once with each model and compare the output.
Hasil
Markdown atau JSON anda akan dipaparkan di sini.
Use one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "aws/textract",
"fallbacks": ["paddle/paddleocr-vl"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}