Jina OCR vs PaddleOCR-VL
Jina OCR is cheaper per page; PaddleOCR-VL is faster; only PaddleOCR-VL supports bounding boxes, confidence.
Jina OCRjina/jina-ocr | PaddleOCR-VLpaddle/paddleocr-vl | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Open source | Open source |
| Price | 1 credits / page | 2 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $1.00 | $2.00 |
| Typical speed | 1.5 s / page | 1.3 s / page |
| Best for | Clean Markdown at low cost | CJK documents |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | About 100 languages | 109 languages |
| Max pages per request | 200 | 500 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | No | No |
| Math | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bounding boxes | No | ✓ Yes |
| Confidence | No | ✓ Yes |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Jina OCR
Compact page-to-Markdown model from Jina AI, built on the DeepSeek-OCR encoder.
Jina OCR detailsPaddleOCR-VL
Open-source document model from Baidu. Excellent on Chinese, Japanese and Korean.
PaddleOCR-VL detailsTry both on your own file
Run the file once with each model and compare the output.
Hasil
Markdown atau JSON anda akan dipaparkan di sini.
Use one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "jina/jina-ocr",
"fallbacks": ["paddle/paddleocr-vl"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}