Mistral OCR vs Jina OCR
Jina OCR is cheaper per page; Mistral OCR is faster; only Mistral OCR supports bounding boxes.
Mistral OCRmistral/mistral-ocr | Jina OCRjina/jina-ocr | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | OCR API | Open source |
| Price | 6 credits / page | 1 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $6.00 | $1.00 |
| Typical speed | 0.9 s / page | 1.5 s / page |
| Best for | High-volume PDF to Markdown | Clean Markdown at low cost |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | 100+ languages | About 100 languages |
| Max pages per request | 1,000 | 200 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | No | No |
| Math | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bounding boxes | ✓ Yes | No |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Mistral OCR
Fast document OCR that returns clean Markdown with tables and embedded images.
Mistral OCR detailsJina OCR
Compact page-to-Markdown model from Jina AI, built on the DeepSeek-OCR encoder.
Jina OCR detailsTry both on your own file
Run the file once with each model and compare the output.
Резултат
Вашиот Markdown или JSON ќе се појави тука.
Use one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "mistral/mistral-ocr",
"fallbacks": ["jina/jina-ocr"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}