Gemini Flash vs DeepSeek-OCR
DeepSeek-OCR is cheaper per page; DeepSeek-OCR is faster; only Gemini Flash supports handwriting; only DeepSeek-OCR supports bounding boxes.
Gemini Flashgoogle/gemini-flash | DeepSeek-OCRdeepseek/deepseek-ocr | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Vision model | Open source |
| Price | 3 credits / page | 1 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $3.00 | $1.00 |
| Typical speed | 1.6 s / page | 1.1 s / page |
| Best for | Handwriting and mixed layouts | Cheap bulk conversion |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | 100+ languages | 100+ languages |
| Max pages per request | 1,000 | 200 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | ✓ Yes | No |
| Math | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bounding boxes | No | ✓ Yes |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Gemini Flash
General vision model with strong handwriting and layout understanding at a low price.
Gemini Flash detailsTry both on your own file
Run the file once with each model and compare the output.
Резултат
Вашиот Markdown или JSON ќе се појави тука.
Use one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "google/gemini-flash",
"fallbacks": ["deepseek/deepseek-ocr"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}