Gemini Flash vs Tesseract
Tesseract is cheaper per page; Tesseract is faster; only Gemini Flash supports tables, handwriting, math.
Gemini Flashgoogle/gemini-flash | Tesseracttesseract/tesseract | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Vision model | Open source |
| Price | 3 credits / page | Free |
| Per 1,000 pages | $3.00 | $0.00 |
| Typical speed | 1.6 s / page | 0.6 s / page |
| Best for | Handwriting and mixed layouts | Clean printed text, free |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | 100+ languages | 100+ languages |
| Max pages per request | 1,000 | 500 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | No |
| Handwriting | ✓ Yes | No |
| Math | ✓ Yes | No |
| Bounding boxes | No | No |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Gemini Flash
General vision model with strong handwriting and layout understanding at a low price.
Gemini Flash detailsTry both on your own file
Run the file once with each model and compare the output.
نتیجه
خروجی Markdown یا JSON شما اینجا نمایش داده میشود.
Use one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "google/gemini-flash",
"fallbacks": ["tesseract/tesseract"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}