Gemini Flash vs Jina OCR
Jina OCR is cheaper per page; Jina OCR is faster; only Gemini Flash supports handwriting.
Gemini Flashgoogle/gemini-flash | Jina OCRjina/jina-ocr | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Vision model | Open source |
| Price | 3 credits / page | 1 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $3.00 | $1.00 |
| Typical speed | 1.6 s / page | 1.5 s / page |
| Best for | Handwriting and mixed layouts | Clean Markdown at low cost |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | 100+ languages | About 100 languages |
| Max pages per request | 1,000 | 200 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | ✓ Yes | No |
| Math | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bounding boxes | No | No |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Gemini Flash
General vision model with strong handwriting and layout understanding at a low price.
Gemini Flash detailsJina OCR
Compact page-to-Markdown model from Jina AI, built on the DeepSeek-OCR encoder.
Jina OCR detailsTry both on your own file
Run the file once with each model and compare the output.
نتیجه
خروجی Markdown یا JSON شما اینجا نمایش داده میشود.
Use one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "google/gemini-flash",
"fallbacks": ["jina/jina-ocr"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}