Qianfan OCR vs GLM-OCR
Qianfan OCR is cheaper per page; GLM-OCR is faster; only Qianfan OCR supports handwriting; only GLM-OCR supports bounding boxes, confidence.
Qianfan OCRbaidu/qianfan-ocr | GLM-OCRzai/glm-ocr | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | OCR API | Open source |
| Price | 1 credits / page | 2 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $1.00 | $2.00 |
| Typical speed | 2.0 s / page | 1.3 s / page |
| Best for | Chinese documents | Low-cost general documents |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | Chinese, English and more | 100+ languages |
| Max pages per request | 200 | 500 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | ✓ Yes | No |
| Math | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bounding boxes | No | ✓ Yes |
| Confidence | No | ✓ Yes |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Qianfan OCR
Baidu's OCR-tuned vision model. Strong on Chinese documents and tables.
Qianfan OCR detailsTry both on your own file
Run the file once with each model and compare the output.
Resultado
Tu Markdown o JSON aparecerá aquí.
Use one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "baidu/qianfan-ocr",
"fallbacks": ["zai/glm-ocr"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}