Gemini Flash vs Tesseract
Tesseract is cheaper per page; Tesseract is faster; only Gemini Flash supports tables, handwriting, math.
Gemini Flashgoogle/gemini-flash | Tesseracttesseract/tesseract | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Vision model | Open source |
| Price | 3 credits / page | Free |
| Per 1,000 pages | $3.00 | $0.00 |
| Typical speed | 1.6 s / page | 0.6 s / page |
| Best for | Handwriting and mixed layouts | Clean printed text, free |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | 100+ languages | 100+ languages |
| Max pages per request | 1,000 | 500 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | No |
| Handwriting | ✓ Yes | No |
| Math | ✓ Yes | No |
| Bounding boxes | No | No |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Gemini Flash
General vision model with strong handwriting and layout understanding at a low price.
Gemini Flash detailsTry both on your own file
Run the file once with each model and compare the output.
Resultado
Tu Markdown o JSON aparecerá aquí.
Use one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "google/gemini-flash",
"fallbacks": ["tesseract/tesseract"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}