TrOCR vs OCR.space
TrOCR is faster; only TrOCR supports handwriting; only OCR.space supports tables, bounding boxes, multilingual.
TrOCRmicrosoft/trocr | OCR.spaceocrspace/ocr-space | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Open source | OCR API |
| Price | 1 credit / page | 1 credit / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $1.00 | $1.00 |
| Typical speed | 1.2 s / page | 1.5 s / page |
| Best for | Handwritten text lines | Cheap simple OCR |
| Inputs | images | PDF, images |
| Languages | English | 20+ languages |
| Max pages per request | 100 | 100 |
| Tables | No | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | ✓ Yes | No |
| Math | No | No |
| Bounding boxes | No | ✓ Yes |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | No | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Coming soon | Coming soon |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
TrOCR
Transformer text recognition model. Reads single text lines, including handwriting.
TrOCR detailsOCR.space
Low-cost OCR API with a large free tier. Returns text, word boxes and searchable PDFs.
OCR.space detailsUse one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "microsoft/trocr",
"fallbacks": ["ocrspace/ocr-space"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}