TrOCR vs ABBYY FineReader
TrOCR is cheaper per page; TrOCR is faster; only TrOCR supports handwriting; only ABBYY FineReader supports tables, bounding boxes, multilingual.
TrOCRmicrosoft/trocr | ABBYY FineReaderabbyy/finereader | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Open source | OCR API |
| Price | 1 credit / page | 14 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $1.00 | $14.00 |
| Typical speed | 1.2 s / page | 2.0 s / page |
| Best for | Handwritten text lines | Office scans to Word and PDF |
| Inputs | images | PDF, images |
| Languages | English | 190+ languages |
| Max pages per request | 100 | 1,000 |
| Tables | No | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | ✓ Yes | No |
| Math | No | No |
| Bounding boxes | No | ✓ Yes |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | No | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Coming soon | Coming soon |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
TrOCR
Transformer text recognition model. Reads single text lines, including handwriting.
TrOCR detailsABBYY FineReader
Long-standing desktop OCR software. ABBYY also sells OCR SDKs and a cloud API. Price is an estimate.
ABBYY FineReader detailsUse one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "microsoft/trocr",
"fallbacks": ["abbyy/finereader"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}