Granite Docling vs ABBYY FineReader
Granite Docling is cheaper per page; Granite Docling is faster; only Granite Docling supports math; only ABBYY FineReader supports multilingual.
Granite Doclingibm/granite-docling | ABBYY FineReaderabbyy/finereader | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Open source | OCR API |
| Price | 1 credit / page | 14 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $1.00 | $14.00 |
| Typical speed | 1.5 s / page | 2.0 s / page |
| Best for | Small-model document conversion | Office scans to Word and PDF |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | English, experimental CJK and Arabic | 190+ languages |
| Max pages per request | 500 | 1,000 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | No | No |
| Math | ✓ Yes | No |
| Bounding boxes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | No | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Coming soon | Coming soon |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Granite Docling
Compact IBM vision model that converts pages to DocTags for the Docling pipeline.
Granite Docling detailsABBYY FineReader
Long-standing desktop OCR software. ABBYY also sells OCR SDKs and a cloud API. Price is an estimate.
ABBYY FineReader detailsUse one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "ibm/granite-docling",
"fallbacks": ["abbyy/finereader"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}