GPT vs Marker
GPT is cheaper per page; GPT is faster; only GPT supports handwriting; only Marker supports bounding boxes.
GPTopenai/gpt | Markerdatalab/marker | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Vision model | OCR API |
| Price | 11 credits / page | 14 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $11.00 | $14.00 |
| Typical speed | 2.4 s / page | 2.5 s / page |
| Best for | Messy scans, custom instructions | Books and research papers |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images, DOCX |
| Languages | 50+ languages | 90+ languages |
| Max pages per request | 100 | 1,000 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | ✓ Yes | No |
| Math | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bounding boxes | No | ✓ Yes |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Coming soon |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Marker
Hosted version of the open-source Marker and Surya models. Strong on books and papers.
Marker detailsUse one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "openai/gpt",
"fallbacks": ["datalab/marker"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}