Claude vs GLM-OCR
GLM-OCR is cheaper per page; GLM-OCR is faster; only Claude supports handwriting; only GLM-OCR supports bounding boxes, confidence.
Claudeanthropic/claude | GLM-OCRzai/glm-ocr | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Vision model | Open source |
| Price | 14 credits / page | 2 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $14.00 | $2.00 |
| Typical speed | 2.6 s / page | 1.3 s / page |
| Best for | Long dense documents | Low-cost general documents |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | 50+ languages | 100+ languages |
| Max pages per request | 100 | 500 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | ✓ Yes | No |
| Math | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bounding boxes | No | ✓ Yes |
| Confidence | No | ✓ Yes |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Try both on your own file
Run the file once with each model and compare the output.
النتيجة
سيظهر ناتج Markdown أو JSON هنا.
Use one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "anthropic/claude",
"fallbacks": ["zai/glm-ocr"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}